repost
· · to read
The Way Forward by Alec Zeck (Telegram)

10 dangerous belief systems permeating society:

1. Scientism: The “Scientific Community” possesses superior knowledge of the natural world, “scientific consensus” should be accepted as gospel that we orient our lives around.

2. The Illusion of Authority: Men and women who call themselves “government” possess inherent authority to issue commands to other men and women, and use force against the non-compliant.

3. The Government Salvation Myth: The problems that are largely created by government and its supposed authority can be resolved through expanded government intervention and enhanced authority.

4. The Contagion Myth: Healthy individuals can become ill via exposure to sick people or their bodily fluids.

5. Our Body’s Limitations: Our bodies are flawed and lacking, requiring pharmaceuticals, injections, and surgeries to maintain health.

6. Anthropocentric Superiority: Man-made creations are superior to God’s natural creations. Nature is flawed and can be enhanced through human innovation.

7. Earth’s Limitations: The Earth requires human intervention to overcome its supposed shortcomings; interfering with nature has no negative consequences.

8. Use-of-Force Fallacy: One peoples’ liberty is preserved through violence and destruction inflicted upon other peoples.

9. Moral Disconnection: Human beings incur no consequences for their harmful beliefs, words, and actions.

10. Materialism: reality is solely physical, and only experiences through the 5 primary senses are valid.

repost
· · to read

by Time of Transition

Them: You won’t be able to attend a concert or football games

Me: I don’t mind

Them: You can’t go to a large shopping mall

Me: I’ll survive

Them: You can’t drink at the pub

Me: I no longer drink

Them: You can’t enter night clubs

Me: I don’t go out at night

Them: We’ll tell your employer

Me: I don’t have one

Them: We’ll take it from your salary

Me: I don’t have a salary

Them: You can’t go to your job

Me: I don’t have or want your job

Them: You can’t be in the city

Me: I prefer living out in nature

Them: You can’t go to McDonald’s or Burger King

Me: I haven’t in years anyway

Them: You can’t eat at restaurants

Me: I’ll order takeaway

Them: You can’t shop at large grocery stores

Me: I grow my own food and buy from local farmers

Them: You can’t be part of society

Me: I already checked out

Them: Your kids can’t come to school

Me: I’ll homeschool

Them: You’ll be on your own

Me: I’m surrounded by my family and tribe and all the people reaching the same conclusion all over the world

Them: You can’t choose for yourself

Me: I just did

Them: What can we tempt you with?

Me: Nothing

checkin
· · to read
Sometimes I find the swimming gems close to the cabin. And sometimes the wind speaks. Returned home with the biggest feather I have found so far. A white swan was the messenger; reminding me of my words and the power they have.
checkin
· · to read

Found my foxhole for the night. Swimming in Borrevannet during sunset brings a lot of associations.

checkin
· · to read

Today the water heals me. The salty waters are a healing agent. Luna gets to swim and hone her frisbee skills.

photo
· · to read

Considering how close I live to this attraction (Mørkgonga), it was time to check it out. After doing kambo earlier, going for a hike in nature was a no-brainer.

watch
· · to read

Is it really “green” and “environmentally smart” to use clearcutting methods in forestry? Or is it an outdated, inefficient and heavily carbon-emitting practice that does not belong in a world already struggling with forest fires and a climate crisis? A film on eco forestry and about ecological alternatives to clearcutting.

In spite of the Swedish forestry industry’s advertising campaigns that attempt to cast them in the role of “green heroes”, the sadness in the film’s director’s soul at the sight of a clear cut area is palpable. How is it possible to chop down an entire woods and still use labels such as “environmental care”?

In this film you’ll see a variety of people talk about their relationship with the forest. There’s the hands-on practical advice for ecological alternatives to clearcutting, there’s the scientific evidence of what clearcutting does, there’s the politician using spoken word to convey her message and there’s the front line testimony from a man who lives large parts of the year in the woods.

The starting point is the gut feeling from the filmmaker that clearcutting simply feels wrong. The ending is a beginning; an invitation into seeing the forest as a collaborating partner rather than this “thing” for humans to exploit. How would our view of the forest change if we stopped seeing it merely as an economic resource, and instead as an invitation to an ecological partnership?